Cases8000481/2025

Claimant v GXO Logistics UK Limited

30 July 2025Before Employment Judge B CampbellScotlandin person

Outcome

Partly successful

Individual claims

Direct Discrimination(race)partly succeeded

Tribunal struck out historic complaints (training denials from 2010, sick pay issues 2018-2019) as having no reasonable prospect of success. Complaints about work allocation following return from hernia surgery in July/August 2022 onwards were allowed to proceed as they had reasonable prospect and were potentially within time.

Direct Discrimination(race)partly succeeded

Direct discrimination claims relating to manager Stephen Panton repeatedly scheduling claimant to physically demanding work areas despite medical restrictions following hernia operation (August 2022-May 2025) allowed to proceed. Earlier claims struck out as too historic and having no reasonable prospect of success.

Harassment(race)partly succeeded

Harassment complaint relating to post-surgery work allocation (August 2022 onwards) allowed to proceed. Tribunal found sufficient basis for the claim to continue but could not determine likelihood of success at preliminary stage. Earlier harassment complaints struck out.

Facts

Slovak warehouse operative employed since 2007 alleged race discrimination including denial of training opportunities, health-related work allocation issues, and suspension of sick pay. Following hernia surgery in June 2022, he returned to work in July/August 2022 with medical restrictions. He alleged his manager Stephen Panton repeatedly assigned him to physically demanding areas despite knowing his medical limitations. Claimant believed he was treated worse than Scottish colleagues due to being a 'foreigner' perceived as less aware of his rights.

Decision

Tribunal struck out historic complaints dating to 2010-2019 (training denials, sick pay issues) as having no reasonable prospect of success and being too old to revive. However, complaints about work allocation following return from surgery in July/August 2022 onwards were allowed to proceed as they had reasonable prospect of success and were potentially within time as continuing acts. Deposit order application refused.

Practical note

Even where a claimant's pleadings are unclear and partially time-barred, tribunals will preserve claims with a reasonable prospect of success, particularly for unrepresented claimants whose first language is not English, applying the strict 'draconian' test for strike-out applications.

Legal authorities cited

Blockbuster Entertainment Ltd v James [2006] EWCA Civ 684Ezsias v North Glamorgan NHS Trust [2007] EWCA Civ 330H v Ishmail UKEAT/0021/16

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.26Equality Act 2010 s.13Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 r.40Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 r.38

Case details

Case number
8000481/2025
Decision date
30 July 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
logistics
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Employment details

Role
Warehouse operative
Service
18 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No