Claimant v Fastrax Conveyors Rollers Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed at an interlocutory stage because the claimant did not have the requisite two years of continuous service with the respondent to bring such a claim.
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant the 'dividend element' of his wages for April 2024 (£3,750). The tribunal concluded that these payments were contractual wages, not genuine dividends, as no shares were ever transferred and the payments were fixed monthly amounts. The respondent's argument that payment was discretionary or linked to profitability was rejected due to lack of evidence.
The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to pay full notice pay. The claimant was entitled to two weeks' notice including both the PAYE element and the 'dividend element' of his remuneration. The respondent only paid the PAYE element, resulting in an underpayment of £1,875 (representing two weeks of the dividend element).
The respondent breached its statutory duty under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 by failing to provide a statement of employment particulars. The tribunal found the failure particularly serious given the respondent's cavalier attitude to compliance and awarded four weeks' wages (the maximum) as compensation, totalling £11,230.76.
Facts
The claimant was employed as a designer for just over five months. His remuneration package comprised two monthly payments: a PAYE element (£3,407.59) and a 'dividend element' (£3,750), totalling £100,000 per annum. No shares were ever transferred to the claimant despite pre-employment discussions. Following a dispute, the claimant was dismissed in April 2024 and the respondent failed to pay the dividend element for April or include it in notice pay calculations. Post-termination, the respondent attempted to recharacterise these payments through fictitious invoices from the claimant's dormant company.
Decision
The tribunal found in favour of the claimant on all substantive claims. It determined that the 'dividend element' was contractual wages, not genuine dividends, as no shares were transferred and payments were fixed monthly amounts unrelated to company performance. The respondent was ordered to pay £3,750 for unlawful deduction of April wages, £1,875 for unpaid notice, and £11,230.76 (four weeks' wages at the maximum) for failing to provide written terms of employment. The unfair dismissal claim had been previously struck out due to insufficient service.
Practical note
Employers cannot avoid employment law obligations by artificially labelling wages as 'dividends' without genuine share ownership; tribunals will look at the substance of arrangements, and creative post-termination accounting cannot retrospectively alter the contractual position.
Award breakdown
Award equivalent: 8.8 weeks' gross pay
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6007531/2024
- Decision date
- 29 July 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- manufacturing
- Represented
- No
- Rep type
- in house
Employment details
- Role
- designer
- Salary band
- £100,000+
- Service
- 5 months
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No