Claimant v Jemma Trinick
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages totalling £475 gross. The respondent failed to present a valid response, and judgment was entered in default under rule 22.
The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The respondent failed to pay notice period amounting to £950 (representing 2 weeks' pay at £475 per week).
The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement of £166.25. The respondent did not defend the claim having failed to present a response on time.
The tribunal found the respondent failed to reimburse the claimant for petrol expenses of £81. This was a breach of contract claim determined in the claimant's favour by default.
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the claimant did not have sufficient length of service (two years) to bring such a claim, and no exception to that rule applied in her case.
Facts
Miss Vecci was employed by Ms Trinick and was dismissed without proper notice. The respondent failed to pay wages owed, holiday pay accrued, and petrol expenses. The claimant brought claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, unlawful deduction of wages, holiday pay, and expense reimbursement. The respondent failed to present a response to the claim.
Decision
The tribunal entered default judgment in favour of the claimant under rule 22 for wrongful dismissal, unlawful deduction of wages, holiday pay, and expense reimbursement, awarding a total of £1,672.25. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed as the claimant lacked the necessary two years' service.
Practical note
Default judgments allow tribunals to determine claims on paper where respondents fail to engage, but statutory qualifying periods for unfair dismissal still apply regardless of the procedural posture.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 3300077/2025
- Decision date
- 29 July 2025
- Hearing type
- default judgment
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Name
- Jemma Trinick
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- No
Employment details
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No