Claimant v Novita Diamonds Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the dismissal unfair because there was no genuine redundancy situation, the logistics operations function continued, and there was a fundamental breach of fairness requirements. The claimant was given no prior warning or consultation before the meeting on 12 July 2024 which opened after all final decisions had been made. The tribunal found no proper consultation occurred when proposals were in a formative stage as required by law.
Facts
The claimant worked as Operations Logistics Manager for a diamond trading company from February 2022 to July 2024. On 12 July 2024, one hour before end of shift, she was called to a meeting and told her role was redundant effective immediately. No prior warning or consultation had occurred. All decisions including dismissal and no redeployment had been made before the meeting. The claimant raised a grievance challenging the lack of consultation, unclear selection criteria, and failure to explore alternatives. She subsequently returned to Italy due to ill-health and inability to afford her London accommodation.
Decision
The tribunal found the dismissal unfair. The respondent's witnesses failed to appear to prove a potentially fair reason for dismissal. The tribunal was not satisfied there was a genuine redundancy situation as the logistics operations function continued. There was no prior consultation before the meeting which opened after all decisions had been made. The tribunal declined to apply a Polkey reduction given the fundamental breach and lack of reliable evidence about the workplace situation.
Practical note
A redundancy dismissal will be unfair where all decisions are made before any consultation meeting with the employee, and employers cannot remedy fundamental procedural failures through an appeal process alone.
Award breakdown
Award equivalent: 32.4 weeks' gross pay
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6012641/2024
- Decision date
- 29 July 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 2
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- retail
- Represented
- No
- Rep type
- in house
Employment details
- Role
- Operations Logistics Manager (previously Production Manager)
- Salary band
- £40,000–£50,000
- Service
- 2 years
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No