Cases6000938/2024

Claimant v Crystal Springs Consumer Division Limited

25 July 2025Before Employment Judge HallidayBristolremote video

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalnot determined

This preliminary hearing determined that references to a meeting on 23 October 2024 and subsequent without prejudice settlement negotiations are inadmissible under section 111A Employment Rights Act 1996 and protected by without prejudice privilege. The substantive unfair dismissal claim remains listed for final hearing in July 2025.

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)not determined

This preliminary hearing determined that references to a meeting on 23 October 2024 and subsequent without prejudice settlement negotiations are privileged and inadmissible. The substantive disability discrimination claim remains listed for final hearing in July 2025.

Facts

The claimant worked for the respondent from October 2021 to February 2024. Following workplace disputes with colleagues, an informal warning about inappropriate messaging in October 2023, and a grievance raised against him, the respondent offered a settlement agreement on 23 October 2023 as an alternative to a grievance investigation. The claimant rejected the offer and subsequently made counter-offers. Mediation occurred in January 2024 before the claimant's dismissal in February 2024. The claimant brought claims for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination.

Decision

The tribunal ruled that references to the 23 October 2023 meeting and all subsequent without prejudice settlement negotiations are inadmissible in the unfair dismissal claim under section 111A ERA and privileged in the disability discrimination claim under the without prejudice rule. There was no improper conduct or unambiguous impropriety by the respondent. The substantive claims remain listed for final hearing in July 2025.

Practical note

Offering a settlement agreement while factually stating potential disciplinary consequences does not constitute improper conduct or unambiguous impropriety, and section 111A protection applies even when settlement is offered in response to workplace grievances.

Legal authorities cited

Gallagher v McKinnon's Auto and Tyres Ltd [2025] IRLR 112Hawkes v Brewin Dolphin Securities Limited ET [2305111/05]Framlington Group Ltd v Barneston [2007] IRLR 598A v B and another [EAT 0012/2013]Portnykh v Normura International plc [2014] IRLR 259Swiss Re Corporate Solutions Ltd v Sommer [2022] IRLR 650

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.98Employment Rights Act 1996 s.111A

Case details

Case number
6000938/2024
Decision date
25 July 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No