Claimant v Ascott Transport Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
Preliminary hearing to determine disability status only. The substantive claim of direct discrimination will be heard at the final hearing listed for August 2026.
Preliminary hearing to determine disability status only. The substantive claim of discrimination arising from disability will be heard at the final hearing listed for August 2026.
Preliminary hearing to determine disability status only. The substantive claim regarding failure to make reasonable adjustments will be heard at the final hearing listed for August 2026.
Facts
The claimant, a warehouse operative employed since June 2019, brought discrimination claims alleging the respondent wrongly applied the Bradford Factor to absences related to various claimed disabilities. A preliminary hearing was held to determine which of his alleged impairments constituted disabilities under the Equality Act 2010. The claimant relied on eight impairments: depression, sleep apnoea, knee injury, back pain/sciatica, hiatus hernia, kidney stones, IBS, glaucoma, and insulin resistance. The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant, his partner, and reviewed medical records from his GP and a private Polish GP. The material time period was determined to be 28 March 2021 to 23 May 2024.
Decision
The tribunal found the claimant was disabled due to his knee injury (from 1 April 2023 to 23 May 2024) and his back pain/sciatica (throughout the material time period from 28 March 2021 to 23 May 2024). The tribunal rejected disability status for depression, sleep apnoea, hiatus hernia, and kidney stones, finding the claimant's evidence lacked credibility and contradicted medical evidence showing minimal treatment and mild or resolved symptoms. The judge found the claimant an unreliable witness who avoided questions and had poor recollection, and noted a redacted GP entry about fraudulently altering blood test request forms.
Practical note
Credibility is crucial in disability discrimination cases - tribunals will closely scrutinise consistency between a claimant's witness evidence and contemporaneous medical records, and may reject disability claims where alleged severe effects are not mentioned to GPs or are inconsistent with minimal treatment received.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2600789/2024
- Decision date
- 25 July 2025
- Hearing type
- preliminary
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- logistics
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Employment details
- Role
- Warehouse Operative/VNA Driver
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister