Cases6012826/2025

Claimant v Home Bargains

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claimant had less than two years service and therefore did not meet the statutory qualifying period required under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal struck out the claim after giving the claimant an opportunity to provide a reason why it should not be struck out.

Facts

The claimant was employed by Home Bargains for less than two years. He brought a complaint of unfair dismissal. The tribunal noted that other complaints existed but were not affected by this judgment.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant did not have the statutory minimum of two years service required under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant was given an opportunity to provide reasons why the claim should not be struck out but failed to do so.

Practical note

Unfair dismissal claims require at least two years continuous service unless the dismissal falls within an automatically unfair category which does not require qualifying service.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108

Case details

Case number
6012826/2025
Decision date
23 July 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No