Cases6022997/2024

Claimant v Authentic Italian Street Food Limited

22 July 2025Before Employment Judge EeleyLiverpoolremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesstruck out

The tribunal found the claim was presented 38 days out of time. The claimant had access to legal advice from solicitors throughout the period and was aware of his right to claim for unpaid wages. He made a deliberate choice to attempt resolution via correspondence rather than filing a tribunal claim. The tribunal concluded it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have complied with the three-month time limit, and therefore the claim was dismissed as being out of time.

Holiday Paystruck out

This claim was part of the same ET1 submission and was similarly dismissed as being out of time. The tribunal applied the same reasoning regarding reasonable practicability of compliance with the statutory time limit.

Facts

Mr Calogero worked as Operations Manager/Chef for Authentic Italian Street Food Ltd from August 2022 to August 2024. He resigned with immediate effect on 9 August 2024 following non-payment of wages, the last deduction occurring on 16 August 2024. He had consulted solicitors from August onwards primarily regarding commercial disputes (as he was also a director and shareholder), but those solicitors also addressed unpaid wages in correspondence with the respondent. He filed his ET1 on 23 December 2024, 38 days after the three-month limitation deadline of 15 November 2024.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the claims as out of time. Employment Judge Eeley found it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have filed within the three-month time limit. The claimant had access to solicitors throughout the relevant period and was aware of his rights to claim for unpaid wages. He made a deliberate choice to pursue resolution through correspondence rather than tribunal proceedings. ACAS Early Conciliation began after the primary time limit had expired and therefore provided no extension.

Practical note

Even where a claimant has legitimate ongoing commercial disputes with their former employer, they must still comply with strict employment tribunal time limits for wage claims, particularly when they have access to legal advice throughout the relevant period.

Legal authorities cited

Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Ltd [1974] ICR 53Wall's Meat Co Ltd v Khan [1979] ICR 52Porter v Bandridge Ltd [1978] ICR 943Palmer and anor v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council [1984] ICR 372Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser EAT 0165/07Lowri Beck Services Ltd v Brophy [2019] EWCA Civ 2490

Statutes

Civil Procedure Rules 1998Employment Rights Act 1996 s.207BEmployment Rights Act 1996 s.23

Case details

Case number
6022997/2024
Decision date
22 July 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
No
Rep type
in house

Employment details

Role
Operations Manager/Chef
Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No