Claimant v Practice Plus Group Health and Rehabilitation Services Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the claim not well-founded after a five-day full merits hearing. Reasons were given orally at the hearing but not provided in writing.
The tribunal found the claim not well-founded after a five-day full merits hearing. Reasons were given orally at the hearing but not provided in writing.
The tribunal found the claim not well-founded after a five-day full merits hearing. Reasons were given orally at the hearing but not provided in writing.
The tribunal found the claim not well-founded after a five-day full merits hearing. Reasons were given orally at the hearing but not provided in writing.
Facts
Mr Osuji brought claims against Practice Plus Group Health and Rehabilitation Services Limited for unfair dismissal, direct race discrimination, harassment related to race, and breach of contract. The case was heard over five days at London South Employment Tribunal. Mr Osuji represented himself while the respondent was represented by counsel.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed all of Mr Osuji's claims, finding them not well-founded. The tribunal heard the case over five days and gave reasons orally at the hearing. All claims failed including unfair dismissal, race discrimination, harassment and breach of contract.
Practical note
A self-represented claimant bringing multiple claims including unfair dismissal and race-related discrimination claims against a healthcare employer failed on all grounds after a substantial five-day hearing.
Case details
- Case number
- 2306252/2023
- Decision date
- 22 July 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 5
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No