Cases3303660/2024

Claimant v Anna Valley Ltd

18 July 2025Before Employment Judge Anstison papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out because the respondent company is in administration and the claimant failed to obtain either the administrator's consent or court permission to continue proceedings as required by the Insolvency Act 1986, despite being given an opportunity to do so.

Facts

The claimant brought employment tribunal proceedings against Anna Valley Ltd, a company in administration. The claimant failed to obtain either the administrator's consent or court permission to continue the proceedings as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. On 4 February 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued, but by 18 July 2025 there was no indication of compliance.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant failed to obtain the necessary administrator's consent or court permission required under the Insolvency Act 1986 to continue proceedings against a company in administration, despite being given an opportunity to remedy this.

Practical note

Claims against companies in administration require either the administrator's consent or court permission to proceed, and failure to obtain this will result in the claim being struck out.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Insolvency Act 1986

Case details

Case number
3303660/2024
Decision date
18 July 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No