Cases2411554/2023

Claimant v Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust

17 July 2025Before Employment Judge AinscoughLiverpoolremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found that the claimant was not an employee within the meaning of section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Without employee status, the claimant cannot bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim under section 98 ERA 1996.

Automatic Unfair Dismissalfailed

The claim for automatic unfair dismissal under section 101A ERA 1996 (health and safety detriment) failed. The tribunal found the claimant was not an employee and therefore could not succeed in this claim.

Whistleblowingfailed

The automatic unfair dismissal claim under section 103A ERA 1996 (whistleblowing) was unsuccessful. The tribunal determined the claimant lacked employee status, which is a prerequisite for this claim.

Automatic Unfair Dismissalfailed

The claim for automatic unfair dismissal under section 104 ERA 1996 (assertion of statutory right) failed. The claimant's lack of employee status under section 230 ERA 1996 meant this claim could not succeed.

Wrongful Dismissalfailed

The wrongful dismissal claim was unsuccessful and dismissed. The tribunal found the claimant was not an employee, which was fatal to this contractual claim for breach of the employment contract.

Facts

Mr Kashem brought multiple claims against Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust including unfair dismissal, automatic unfair dismissal on various grounds (health and safety, whistleblowing, assertion of statutory right), and wrongful dismissal. The case was heard over three days by video hearing with the claimant representing himself and the respondent represented by counsel.

Decision

The tribunal determined that the claimant was not an employee within the meaning of section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. As a result, all dismissal-related claims failed because employee status is a prerequisite for such claims. The judgment notes that remaining claims will continue, suggesting there may be other claims that do not require employee status.

Practical note

Employment status is a threshold issue that must be established before unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal claims can succeed; workers who are not employees cannot bring these claims regardless of the merits.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.101AERA 1996 s.230ERA 1996 s.104ERA 1996 s.103AERA 1996 s.98

Case details

Case number
2411554/2023
Decision date
17 July 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
3
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No