Cases6013685/2024

Claimant v HM Revenue & Customs

14 July 2025Before Employment Judge C H O'RourkeManchesterremote video

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Direct Discrimination(disability)dismissed on withdrawal

Claim dismissed by consent of the parties at a preliminary hearing. The parties agreed to withdraw this claim and it was formally dismissed by the tribunal.

Indirect Discrimination(disability)dismissed on withdrawal

Claim dismissed by consent of the parties at a preliminary hearing. The parties agreed to withdraw this claim and it was formally dismissed by the tribunal.

Victimisationdismissed on withdrawal

Claim dismissed by consent of the parties at a preliminary hearing. The parties agreed to withdraw this claim and it was formally dismissed by the tribunal.

Harassment(sex)dismissed on withdrawal

Claim dismissed by consent of the parties at a preliminary hearing. The parties agreed to withdraw this claim and it was formally dismissed by the tribunal.

Harassment(disability)not determined

Claim continues but limited by consent to one specific allegation: facing a potential threat of dismissal. This claim was narrowed at a preliminary hearing and remains to be determined on its merits.

Facts

Mrs Bhola brought multiple discrimination claims against HMRC and a named individual manager, Ms Louise Hilton. The claims included direct and indirect disability discrimination, victimisation, harassment related to disability, and harassment related to sex. At a preliminary hearing held by video, the parties reached a consent agreement to narrow the scope of the claims.

Decision

By consent, the tribunal dismissed the second respondent (Ms Hilton) from the proceedings and dismissed four of the five claims. The remaining harassment related to disability claim was limited to one specific allegation concerning a potential threat of dismissal. This was a case management decision rather than a determination on merits.

Practical note

Consent orders at preliminary hearings can significantly narrow the scope of claims, dismissing multiple allegations while preserving one focused claim for a full merits hearing.

Case details

Case number
6013685/2024
Decision date
14 July 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
central government
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep