Cases3311671/2024

Claimant v Impact Business Shared Services Ltd

11 July 2025Before Employment Judge M WarrenSouth Easton papers

Outcome

Default judgment£1,871

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal determined under rule 21 that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and awarded the full amount claimed.

Facts

Mr Bexson brought a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages against Impact Business Shared Services Ltd, which was in voluntary liquidation. The claim was presented to the South East Employment Tribunal on 23 October 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response within the required time limit.

Decision

The Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure without a hearing, as the respondent had not filed a valid response. The tribunal found in favour of the claimant and ordered the respondent to pay £1870.73 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages.

Practical note

Where a respondent fails to file a response, a tribunal can make a default judgment under rule 21, but recovery may be difficult where the respondent is in liquidation.

Award breakdown

Unpaid wages£1,871

Case details

Case number
3311671/2024
Decision date
11 July 2025
Hearing type
rule 21
Hearing days
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
professional services
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No