Cases2225902/2024

Claimant v Tesco Stores Limited

10 July 2025Before Employment Judge T.R. SmithLondon Centralin person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time and therefore dismissed it for being out of time.

Breach of Contractwithdrawn

The complaint in relation to notice pay was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed upon withdrawal by the tribunal.

Holiday Paystruck out

The complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time and therefore dismissed it for being out of time.

Direct Discrimination(race)struck out

The complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit. The tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit and therefore dismissed the claim.

Direct Discrimination(disability)struck out

The complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit. The tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit and therefore dismissed the claim.

Other(disability)struck out

The complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability (section 15 EqA 2010) was not presented within the applicable time limit. The tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit and therefore dismissed the claim.

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)struck out

The complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit. The tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit and therefore dismissed the claim.

Harassment(disability)struck out

The complaint of harassment related to disability was not presented within the applicable time limit. The tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit and therefore dismissed the claim.

Facts

Mr Vinokaran brought multiple claims against Tesco Stores Limited including unfair dismissal, notice pay, holiday pay, and various disability and race discrimination claims. This was a preliminary hearing to determine whether the claims had been presented in time. The tribunal found that all claims were presented outside the applicable time limits.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed all claims on the grounds that they were out of time. For the unfair dismissal and holiday pay claims, the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present them in time. For all discrimination claims, the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit. The breach of contract claim for notice pay was dismissed upon withdrawal.

Practical note

Even with legal representation, claimants must strictly comply with time limits; tribunals will not extend time for discrimination claims unless there are compelling reasons under the just and equitable test.

Legal authorities cited

Case details

Case number
2225902/2024
Decision date
10 July 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor