Cases6017669/2024

Claimant v Cardiff and Vale College

10 July 2025Before Employment Judge R HarfieldCardiffin person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Victimisationstruck out

The claim was dismissed against all respondents because it was not presented within the applicable time limit and the tribunal determined it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit.

Victimisationstruck out

The claimant's application to amend to add a complaint of victimisation relating to the referral to EWC was refused by the tribunal.

Facts

Mr Bariczay brought claims of victimisation against Cardiff and Vale College and three individual respondents. He also sought to amend his claim to add a complaint of victimisation relating to a referral to EWC. The matter came before the tribunal at a preliminary hearing to determine jurisdictional issues.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the entire claim on the basis that it was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time. The application to amend to add a further victimisation complaint was also refused.

Practical note

Self-represented claimants must be aware of strict time limits for bringing tribunal claims, and the just and equitable test for extending time is discretionary and not guaranteed even where there may be merit in the underlying complaint.

Legal authorities cited

Case details

Case number
6017669/2024
Decision date
10 July 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
education
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No