Cases1405221/2023

Claimant v Achieve Together Limited

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Constructive Dismissaldismissed on withdrawal

The claimant withdrew her claim on 17 April 2025, the evening before the final hearing was due to start, after failing to comply with case management orders requiring witness statements and disclosure.

Facts

The claimant brought a constructive dismissal claim and repeatedly failed to comply with case management orders, including failing to provide a witness statement or copy the respondent to tribunal correspondence. On 17 April 2025, the evening before a three-day final hearing, she withdrew her claim by email at 9.45pm but did not copy the respondent. The respondent's barrister travelled from Manchester to Exeter for the hearing on 22 April 2025, incurring fees and expenses of £4,172.10.

Decision

The tribunal found the claimant's conduct unreasonable under Rule 74(2)(a). She had been repeatedly warned to copy correspondence to the respondent and warned that costs would be sought if she caused unnecessary attendance. Her late withdrawal without copying the respondent meant they could not avoid incurring costs. The tribunal awarded costs of £4,172.10.

Practical note

Even unrepresented claimants must comply with basic tribunal rules such as copying correspondence; late withdrawal without notice can result in costs orders for wasted expenditure.

Legal authorities cited

AQ Ltd v Holden UKEAT/0021/12/CEAOni v UNISON 2015 ICR D17Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] 1 WLR 1119Gee v Shell UK Ltd [2003] IRLR 82Milan v Capsticks Solicitors LLP UKEAT/0093/14/RNDyer v Secretary of State for Employment EAT 183/83Yerrakalva v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council [2012] ICR 420

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 90Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 76Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 74

Case details

Case number
1405221/2023
Decision date
8 July 2025
Hearing type
costs
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No