Cases8000356/2025

Claimant v Mid and East Lothian Drugs SCIO

8 July 2025Before Employment Judge A KempScotlandremote video

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)not determined

This preliminary hearing determined only that the claimant was a disabled person under the Equality Act 2010. The substantive disability discrimination claims have not yet been heard on their merits.

Facts

Ms Carter was employed by a drug rehabilitation charity as a Recovery Worker from April 2023 to September 2024. She had a long history of Complex PTSD stemming from childhood abuse, diagnosed in 1997, depression diagnosed in 2011, and ongoing anxiety. She experienced hypervigilance, poor sleep with nightmares and flashbacks, difficulty leaving her house, problems with concentration and personal interaction, and struggled with basic personal care. She had received trauma-focused counselling, psychological therapy, and anti-depressant medication which caused adverse side-effects.

Decision

The tribunal found that Ms Carter was a disabled person under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at all material times. Despite some concerns about the lack of detail in her evidence, the judge accepted that she had mental impairments (CPTSD, depression, and anxiety) which had a substantial and long-term adverse effect on her ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities including work, personal care, and social interaction. The effect had lasted continuously since at least 1997.

Practical note

A claimant with long-standing mental health conditions can establish disability status even where symptoms fluctuate in response to life events, provided the underlying impairment and its substantial adverse effects have persisted long-term and go beyond normal reactions to stress.

Legal authorities cited

Goodwin v Patent Office [1999] ICR 302Rugamer v Sony Music Entertainment UK Ltd [2002] ICR 381McNicol v Balfour Beatty Rail Maintenance Ltd [2002] ICR 1498Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast Ltd [2002] IRLR 24Chief Constable of Norfolk v Coffey [2019] IRLR 805Ahmed v Metroline Travel Ltd UKEAT/0400/10Leonard v Southern Derbyshire Chamber of Commerce [2001] IRLR 19Aderemi v London and South Eastern Railway Ltd [2013] ICR 591City Facilities Management (UK) Ltd v Ling UKEAT/0396/13Chacón Navas v Eurest Colectividades SA C-13/05 [2006] IRLR 706HK Danmark v Dansk almennyttight Boligselskab C-335/11 [2013] IRLR 571Z v A Department C-363/12 [2014] IRLR 563Milkova v Izpalnitelen director C-406/15 [2017] IRLR 566Britliff v Birmingham City Council [2020] ICR 653Igweike (not fully cited)

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.212(1)Equality Act 2006 s.15(4)European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 ss.2-4Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023Equality Act 2010 s.6Equality Act 2010 Schedule 1

Case details

Case number
8000356/2025
Decision date
8 July 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
Recovery Worker
Service
1 years

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep