Cases1400262/2024

Claimant v Celestial Labs Ltd

4 July 2025Before Employment Judge MurdochBristolremote video

Outcome

Partly successful£21,584

Individual claims

Harassment(disability)succeeded

The Tribunal found the complaint of harassment related to disability well-founded and upheld the claim. The discriminatory act occurred on 21 September 2023. The Tribunal awarded compensation for injury to feelings and financial losses arising from this harassment.

Direct Discrimination(disability)failed

The Tribunal dismissed the direct disability discrimination claim. Under section 212(1) of the Equality Act 2010, the same conduct cannot be both harassment and direct discrimination. Since the harassment allegation was made out, the direct discrimination claim could not succeed on the same facts.

Facts

Ms Prior brought claims of harassment related to disability and direct disability discrimination against her former employer Celestial Labs Ltd. The discriminatory act occurred on 21 September 2023. The claimant represented herself at a two-day hearing, while the respondent was represented by a solicitor. The claimant's net weekly pay was £548 and she suffered 13 weeks of financial loss.

Decision

The Tribunal upheld the harassment related to disability claim but dismissed the direct discrimination claim because the same conduct cannot be both harassment and direct discrimination under section 212(1) of the Equality Act 2010. The Tribunal awarded £10,000 for injury to feelings, £7,124 for past financial losses (13 weeks), and interest totalling £1,938, with the final award grossed up to £21,584.

Practical note

Where the same conduct could constitute both harassment and direct discrimination, a tribunal finding harassment proven will bar a finding of direct discrimination under section 212(1) Equality Act 2010.

Award breakdown

Compensatory award£7,124
Injury to feelings£10,000
Interest£1,938

Vento band: lower

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.212(1)Employment Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996

Case details

Case number
1400262/2024
Decision date
4 July 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
No