Claimant v St Giles Trust

Allegation at paragraph 6.2.1 is fact sensitive and cannot be determined without hearing of evidence. Whilst it has little reasonable prospect of success without evidence, it cannot be said it has no reasonable prospect of success.

Allegation at paragraph 6.2.2 relates to claimant's treatment whilst he was off sick. Appears out of time but determination will be made at final hearing as to whether it was part of continuing act. Cannot be said there is no reasonable prospect of succeeding.

Allegation at paragraph 6.2.3 relates to dismissal. Struck out against Second Respondent as she was not involved in the decision to dismiss. Not struck out against First Respondent as evidence needed to determine why First Respondent took decision to dismiss.

Evidence needed to decide whether First Respondent applied the PCPs, whether claimant suffered the disadvantage (unable to attend work, was off sick, experienced feelings of isolation), and whether it was reasonable to make the adjustment. Cannot be said claim has no reasonable prospect of success.

Allegation at paragraph 8.1.1 cannot be determined without hearing evidence. Cannot be said it has no reasonable prospect of success.

Allegation at paragraph 8.1.2 that First Respondent leaked and distributed recordings of conversations. Claimant does not know who leaked and distributed recordings. Allegation is also out of time. Has no reasonable prospects of success and struck out against both respondents.

Allegation at paragraph 8.1.3 has little reasonable prospect of success for reasons set out in Deposit Order, but will need evidence to determine it. Cannot be said it has no reasonable prospect of success.