Cases1401200/2024

Claimant v University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust

4 July 2025Before Employment Judge Mr M SalterSouthamptonin person

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Direct Discrimination(sex)withdrawn

The claimant withdrew the claim of direct sex discrimination under section 13 EqA prior to the preliminary hearing.

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)not determined

The preliminary hearing determined that the claimant was disabled by reason of joint pain, urinary incontinence, and excessive bleeding, but not by reason of anxiety. The substantive disability discrimination claims remain to be determined at a full merits hearing.

Detriment(disability)withdrawn

The claimant withdrew the claim for discrimination arising from disability under section 15 EqA prior to the preliminary hearing.

Victimisationwithdrawn

The claimant withdrew the victimisation claim under section 27 EqA prior to the preliminary hearing.

Facts

The claimant, a 51-year-old physiotherapist, worked for the NHS trust as an agency worker from February to October 2023 and then as a bank worker until December 2023. She experienced menopause-related symptoms including joint pain, urinary incontinence, excessive bleeding, and anxiety. She was challenged for sending inappropriate messages and told she would have to change locations, after which she terminated her employment. She brought claims of sex and disability discrimination.

Decision

The tribunal determined this was a preliminary hearing on disability status. The tribunal found the claimant was disabled by reason of joint pain, urinary incontinence, and excessive bleeding during the relevant period (12-18 December 2023). However, the tribunal found she was not disabled by reason of anxiety, as the evidence showed anxiety predated her menopause symptoms and was caused by external life events rather than menopause.

Practical note

Menopause-related physical symptoms can constitute a disability under the Equality Act 2010 if they have substantial and long-term adverse effects on day-to-day activities, but anxiety must be clearly linked to menopause rather than external life events to be considered a menopause-related disability.

Legal authorities cited

J v DLA Piper UK LLP [2010] ICR 1052McDougall v Richmond Adult Community College [2008] ICR 431Herry v Dudley Metropolitan Council [2017] ICR 610

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.13Equality Act 2010 s.6Equality Act 2010 s.212(1)Equality Act 2010 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(1)Equality Act 2010 Schedule 1 paragraph 2(2)Equality Act 2010 s.27Equality Act 2010 s.15

Case details

Case number
1401200/2024
Decision date
4 July 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
Physiotherapist
Service
10 months

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister