Cases1311261/2024

Claimant v R&D Miller Limited

3 July 2025Before Employment Judge C TaylorMidlands Westremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£27,018

Individual claims

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract for failing to pay notice pay. The claimant was awarded damages of £4560 calculated using gross pay to reflect Post Employment Notice Pay tax liability.

Holiday Paysucceeded

The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract for failing to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken on the date the claimant's employment ended. The claimant was awarded £2873.36 as net damages.

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded. The respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015, leading to a 20% uplift in the compensatory award.

Facts

Mrs Douglas was employed by R&D Miller Limited which went into liquidation. The respondent failed to pay her notice pay and holiday pay, and dismissed her unfairly without following proper procedures. The company did not attend the tribunal hearing.

Decision

The tribunal found all claims succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay £27,018.12 including notice pay, holiday pay, basic and compensatory awards for unfair dismissal, with a 20% ACAS uplift for failure to follow the disciplinary code.

Practical note

Default judgments against insolvent companies can still result in full awards with ACAS uplifts where there is clear failure to follow proper dismissal procedures.

Award breakdown

Basic award£8,550
Compensatory award£11,038
Notice pay£4,560
Holiday pay£2,873
Pension loss£146
Loss of statutory rights£500

Adjustments

ACAS uplift+20%

Respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015, resulting in a 20% uplift to the compensatory award

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

s 207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992

Case details

Case number
1311261/2024
Decision date
3 July 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister