Cases3306700/2024

Claimant v Lloyds Bank Plc

3 July 2025Before Employment Judge Dickon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out for failure to actively pursue. The claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's letter dated 4 June 2025 inviting representations or a hearing request as to why the claim should not be struck out.

Facts

Mr J Hall brought a claim against his former employer Lloyds Bank Plc. The tribunal wrote to the claimant on 4 June 2025 warning that the claim would be struck out for failure to actively pursue it and offering an opportunity for representations or a hearing request. The claimant failed to respond. A full merits hearing had been listed for 5-7 January 2026.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim on the papers for failure to actively pursue, as the claimant did not respond to the tribunal's warning letter. The scheduled hearing was cancelled.

Practical note

Claimants must actively engage with tribunal directions and correspondence to avoid strike-out for want of prosecution, even where a substantive hearing has been listed.

Case details

Case number
3306700/2024
Decision date
3 July 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
financial services
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No