Claimant v RYFF Europe Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal heard the breach of contract claim over two days with both parties represented. The tribunal found the claim was not well-founded and dismissed it, meaning the claimant failed to prove the respondent was in breach of contract.
Facts
Mr Wright brought a breach of contract claim against his former employer RYFF Europe Limited. The case was heard over two days via remote video hearing. Both parties were legally represented, with the claimant represented by a solicitor and the respondent by counsel. Oral reasons were given at the hearing.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed the breach of contract claim, finding it not well-founded. This means the tribunal determined that the claimant failed to establish that the respondent had breached the employment contract.
Practical note
A breach of contract claim requires the claimant to prove on the balance of probabilities that the respondent breached a contractual term, and a finding that the claim is not well-founded means this burden was not met.
Case details
- Case number
- 6019934/2024
- Decision date
- 2 July 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 2
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor