Claimant v Purple Panda Services Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to make representations in writing or request a hearing following the tribunal's letter dated 29th April 2025.
Facts
The tribunal issued a letter on 29th April 2025 giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit. The claimant failed to respond or provide sufficient representations.
Decision
The tribunal struck out the claim on the basis that it had not been actively pursued and the claimant failed to engage with the tribunal's correspondence offering an opportunity to address the issue.
Practical note
Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal correspondence, or risk having their claims struck out for non-pursuit.
Case details
- Case number
- 6018184/2024
- Decision date
- 2 July 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No