Cases6014811/2024

Claimant v The Traffic Management Company

Outcome

Claimant succeeds

Facts

This is a reconsideration application by the respondent dated 17 September 2025, following a Rule 22 default judgment made in favour of the claimant on 3 September 2025. The respondent stated it did not receive the claim but failed to provide a draft ET3 response form with the reconsideration application.

Decision

The tribunal refused the reconsideration application on the basis that there was no reasonable prospect of varying or revoking the original decision. The respondent failed to provide a properly completed draft ET3 form with its application to set aside the Rule 22 default judgment, which is a requirement.

Practical note

A respondent seeking to set aside a Rule 22 default judgment must accompany their application with a properly completed draft ET3 response form.

Legal authorities cited

Case details

Case number
6014811/2024
Decision date
2 July 2025
Hearing type
reconsideration
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
transport
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No