Claimant v Accenture UK Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The claim was struck out under Rules 37(1)(b), (c), (d) and (e) for unreasonable conduct, non-compliance with tribunal orders, failure to actively pursue the claim, and because it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing. The claimant repeatedly failed to attend hearings, engaged in persistent non-compliance with orders, and demonstrated a pattern of disengagement throughout the proceedings.
Facts
This was the third claim brought by the claimant against Accenture UK Limited. Her two previous claims had been struck out — one for unreasonable conduct and non-compliance, and one as an abuse of process. This third claim, filed July 2023, was characterised by persistent non-attendance at hearings, changing representatives (some of questionable authority), claims of lost passports and homelessness, and a pattern of last-minute excuses. The claimant failed to attend five case management hearings, did not comply with tribunal orders, and did not attend the strike-out hearing despite it being scheduled to accommodate her needs.
Decision
Employment Judge Forde struck out the claim under Rules 37(1)(b), (c), (d) and (e). The judge found the claimant's conduct was unreasonable, scandalous and vexatious; she had persistently failed to comply with tribunal orders; she was not actively pursuing her claim; and it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing. The judge described this as 'difficult to think of a more egregious example of non-compliance and non-engagement by a litigant before the tribunal.'
Practical note
Persistent non-attendance at case management hearings and wilful non-compliance with tribunal orders will result in strike-out, even where a claimant claims health or other difficulties — particularly where there is a history of similar conduct in previous claims.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2212771/2023
- Decision date
- 1 July 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- professional services
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No