Claimant v Openreach Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent. The dismissal did not fall within the band of reasonable responses available to a reasonable employer in the circumstances.
The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of his disability (ADHD with symptoms of anxiety and depression). The respondent failed to show that the treatment was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.
The tribunal found that the claimant was not subjected to direct disability discrimination. There was insufficient evidence that the claimant was treated less favourably than an actual or hypothetical comparator because of his disability.
Facts
Mr Walker was employed by Openreach Limited and was dismissed. He had ADHD with symptoms of anxiety and depression which constituted a disability. He brought claims of unfair dismissal, discrimination arising from disability, and direct disability discrimination. The hearing took place remotely over four days in June 2025.
Decision
The tribunal found that Mr Walker was unfairly dismissed and that he was subjected to unfavourable treatment arising from his disability. However, his claim of direct disability discrimination failed. The case will proceed to a remedy hearing to determine compensation.
Practical note
Employers must ensure dismissal procedures are fair and consider the impact of disability-related factors, even where direct discrimination cannot be established.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2201983/2024
- Decision date
- 30 June 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 4
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- telecoms
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- in house
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No