Cases2201983/2024

Claimant v Openreach Limited

30 June 2025Before Employment Judge EmeryLondon Centralremote video

Outcome

Partly successful

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent. The dismissal did not fall within the band of reasonable responses available to a reasonable employer in the circumstances.

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)succeeded

The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of his disability (ADHD with symptoms of anxiety and depression). The respondent failed to show that the treatment was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

Direct Discrimination(disability)failed

The tribunal found that the claimant was not subjected to direct disability discrimination. There was insufficient evidence that the claimant was treated less favourably than an actual or hypothetical comparator because of his disability.

Facts

Mr Walker was employed by Openreach Limited and was dismissed. He had ADHD with symptoms of anxiety and depression which constituted a disability. He brought claims of unfair dismissal, discrimination arising from disability, and direct disability discrimination. The hearing took place remotely over four days in June 2025.

Decision

The tribunal found that Mr Walker was unfairly dismissed and that he was subjected to unfavourable treatment arising from his disability. However, his claim of direct disability discrimination failed. The case will proceed to a remedy hearing to determine compensation.

Practical note

Employers must ensure dismissal procedures are fair and consider the impact of disability-related factors, even where direct discrimination cannot be established.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.6

Case details

Case number
2201983/2024
Decision date
30 June 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
4
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
telecoms
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Claimant representation

Represented
No