Claimant v Tinklin Springall

The tribunal found that the claimant's beliefs in medical autonomy, homeopathic remedies and rejection of Covid-19 vaccinations do not amount to a protected characteristic under section 10 of the Equality Act 2010. Without a protected characteristic, the direct discrimination claim on grounds of religion or belief cannot proceed and was dismissed.

The tribunal found that the claimant's beliefs in medical autonomy, homeopathic remedies and rejection of Covid-19 vaccinations do not amount to a protected characteristic under section 10 of the Equality Act 2010. Without a protected characteristic, the indirect discrimination claim on grounds of religion or belief cannot proceed and was dismissed.

The tribunal found that the claimant's beliefs in medical autonomy, homeopathic remedies and rejection of Covid-19 vaccinations do not amount to a protected characteristic under section 10 of the Equality Act 2010. Without a protected characteristic, the harassment claim on grounds of religion or belief cannot proceed and was dismissed.

The tribunal determined that from 8 March 2022 the claimant was a disabled person due to depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation. The harassment claim relating to these conditions can proceed to a full hearing. However, the claim relating to a tumour on his eyelid was dismissed as this did not amount to a disability at the relevant times.

The tribunal determined that from 8 March 2022 the claimant was a disabled person due to depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation. The indirect disability discrimination claim relating to these conditions can proceed to a full hearing. However, the claim relating to a tumour on his eyelid was dismissed as this did not amount to a disability at the relevant times.

The tribunal determined that from 8 March 2022 the claimant was a disabled person due to depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation. The unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability claim relating to these conditions can proceed to a full hearing. However, the claim relating to a tumour on his eyelid was dismissed as this did not amount to a disability at the relevant times.

The tribunal determined that from 8 March 2022 the claimant was a disabled person due to depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation. The failure to make reasonable adjustments claim relating to these conditions can proceed to a full hearing. However, the claim relating to a tumour on his eyelid was dismissed as this did not amount to a disability at the relevant times.