Cases3301866/2023

Claimant v Venson Herts Ltd

27 June 2025Before Employment Judge S. MatthewsWatfordremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£30,326

Individual claims

Automatic Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found the complaint of automatic unfair dismissal under s.99 Employment Rights Act 1996 well-founded. The claimant was unfairly dismissed because of her pregnancy, which constitutes an automatically unfair dismissal under pregnancy-related provisions.

Direct Discrimination(pregnancy)succeeded

The tribunal found the complaint of direct pregnancy discrimination well-founded and it succeeded. The claimant was dismissed because of her pregnancy, which constitutes direct discrimination on the protected characteristic of pregnancy.

Facts

Miss Stewart was dismissed by Venson Herts Ltd because of her pregnancy. She brought claims for automatic unfair dismissal and direct pregnancy discrimination. She represented herself at the hearing while the respondent was represented by their Operations Director. The respondent also unreasonably failed to provide written reasons for her dismissal as required by statute.

Decision

The tribunal unanimously found that the claimant was automatically unfairly dismissed because of her pregnancy under s.99 ERA 1996 and that she suffered direct pregnancy discrimination. The tribunal awarded total compensation of £30,326.04 including loss of earnings, injury to feelings, ACAS uplift for failure to follow procedures, and a penalty for failing to provide written reasons for dismissal.

Practical note

Dismissing an employee because of pregnancy is both automatically unfair and constitutes direct discrimination, with tribunals prepared to award substantial compensation including ACAS uplifts and additional penalties for procedural failures such as not providing written reasons.

Award breakdown

Injury to feelings£12,000
Interest£3,991

Vento band: lower

Adjustments

ACAS uplift+15%

Increase in award pursuant to s.207A Trade Union Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to follow ACAS Code. Uplift of £3,364.30 applied.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.92(4)(a)s.207A Trade Union Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992ERA 1996 s.99

Case details

Case number
3301866/2023
Decision date
27 June 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
4
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Employment details

Claimant representation

Represented
No