Cases6000188/2024

Claimant v Macdonalds Restaurants LTD

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claimant did not have the requisite two years continuous service required under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to bring an unfair dismissal complaint. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out despite being given the opportunity to do so.

Facts

The claimant was employed by McDonald's Restaurants Ltd for less than two years. The claimant brought a complaint of unfair dismissal. The tribunal noted that the claimant had other complaints which were not affected by this judgment.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant lacked the requisite two years continuous service required under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant was given the opportunity to provide reasons why the claim should not be struck out but failed to do so.

Practical note

Employees must have at least two years continuous service to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim, and this qualifying period is strictly enforced by tribunals.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108

Case details

Case number
6000188/2024
Decision date
27 June 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
No

Employment details

Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No