Cases6007279/2024

Claimant v Stagecoach Cumbria and North Lancashire Limited

26 June 2025Before Employment Judge CallanManchesterremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Constructive Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found that the respondent's actions did not constitute a fundamental breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. Mr Norbury's handling was guided by the claimant's wishes to deal with matters informally and attempt mediation, and when the full circumstances became known, he encouraged formal proceedings. The claimant also affirmed the contract by remaining employed for over four months after the alleged breaches, continuing to receive sick pay, and engaging with the grievance and appeals process before resigning.

Facts

The claimant, a bus driver, resigned claiming constructive dismissal after being bullied by colleagues following unfounded theft allegations dating from December 2023. The main perpetrator, Mr Lowe, left employment in March 2024. The claimant alleged the respondent failed to investigate adequately and did not suspend Mr Lowe. She went on sick leave from 22 February 2024 and resigned on 8 July 2024 during an appeal hearing. The Operations Manager, Mr Norbury, had initially attempted to resolve matters informally at the claimant's request and then supported formal grievance proceedings once the full extent of the situation became known.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the claim. It found that the respondent's handling of the bullying allegations did not amount to a fundamental breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. Mr Norbury acted in accordance with the claimant's wishes for informal resolution and mediation, and when circumstances became clearer, encouraged formal proceedings. The claimant affirmed the contract by remaining employed for over four months after the alleged breaches, continuing to engage with the grievance process and receiving sick pay before resigning.

Practical note

A manager attempting informal resolution at an employee's request, then supporting formal proceedings when the full situation emerges, will not constitute a fundamental breach justifying constructive dismissal, particularly where the employee delays over four months before resigning and continues to engage with internal processes.

Legal authorities cited

Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International [1998] AC 20British Aircraft Corporation Ltd v Austin [1978] IRLR 332Post Office v Roberts [1980] IRLR 347Omilaju v Waltham Forest London Borough Council [2005] IRLR 35Meikle v Nottinghamshire County Council [2005] ICRWright v North Ayrshire Council [2014] ICR 77Buckland v Bournemouth University [2010] IRLR 445W A Goold (Pearmak) Ltd v McConnell [1995] IRLR 516Western Excavating v Sharp [1978] ICR 221

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.95(1)(c)ERA 1996 s.94ERA 1996 s.95

Case details

Case number
6007279/2024
Decision date
26 June 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
transport
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Employment details

Role
bus driver

Claimant representation

Represented
No