Claimant v Alliance Clinical Services Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The claim was struck out under Rule 38(1)(b), (c) and (d) due to unreasonable conduct in the manner proceedings were conducted, non-compliance with tribunal orders, and failure to actively pursue the claim.
Facts
Mrs Mamoojee brought a claim against Alliance Clinical Services Limited and three individual respondents. The claimant was represented by a lay representative instructed by MH Solicitors LLP. The claimant failed to comply with tribunal orders and did not actively pursue the claim, conducting proceedings in an unreasonable manner.
Decision
The tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 38(1)(b), (c) and (d) on the grounds that the claimant conducted proceedings unreasonably, failed to comply with tribunal orders, and did not actively pursue the claim. Oral reasons were given at the hearing.
Practical note
Claims will be struck out where claimants fail to comply with tribunal orders and do not actively pursue proceedings, even when legally represented.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 1304898/2024
- Decision date
- 26 June 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor