Claimant v The Riverside Group Limited

The tribunal considered the evidence relating to the claimant's dismissal and determined that it did not constitute unfair dismissal. The reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons were requested at that time.

The tribunal found that the claimant's suspension was not an act of direct discrimination because of race. The respondent had legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for the suspension.

The tribunal determined that the investigation into the claimant's conduct was not an act of direct discrimination because of race. The investigation was conducted for legitimate reasons unconnected to the claimant's race.

The tribunal concluded that the claimant's dismissal was not an act of direct discrimination because of race. The decision to dismiss was based on legitimate conduct issues and not influenced by the claimant's race.

The tribunal found that the dismissal was not an act of victimisation. The respondent had not subjected the claimant to a detriment because he had done a protected act.