Cases2301091/2025

Claimant v What's new pussycat ltd

24 June 2025Before Employment Judge D WrightLondon Southon papers

Outcome

Default judgment£3,624

Individual claims

Redundancy Paysucceeded

The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Under rule 21, the tribunal determined the claim on the papers and found the claimant entitled to statutory redundancy payment calculated on his age (66), length of service (10 years) and weekly pay (£241.61).

Facts

The claimant, aged 66, was dismissed by reason of redundancy after 10 years of service with the respondent. His weekly pay was £241.61. The respondent failed to present a valid response to the claim which was filed on 28 January 2025.

Decision

Under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure, the tribunal made a default judgment on the papers without a hearing. The claimant was awarded statutory redundancy payment of £3,624.15, calculated as 1.5 weeks' pay for each of his 10 years of service.

Practical note

Where a respondent fails to defend a redundancy payment claim, the tribunal will determine entitlement on the papers under rule 21, awarding statutory redundancy based on age, service and weekly pay.

Award breakdown

Redundancy pay£3,624

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure rule 21Employment Rights Act 1996

Case details

Case number
2301091/2025
Decision date
24 June 2025
Hearing type
rule 21
Hearing days
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
No

Employment details

Service
10 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No