Claimant v 3D Wealth Partners Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the complaint that the respondent failed to pay a redundancy payment was not well founded and dismissed the claim.
The tribunal determined that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed the claim after a two-day hearing considering the evidence and arguments presented.
The tribunal found that the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was not well-founded and dismissed this claim.
Facts
Mrs Lindsay Nortje brought claims against 3D Wealth Partners Ltd for redundancy payment, unfair dismissal, and breach of contract relating to notice pay. The matter was heard over two days at Cambridge Employment Tribunal. The claimant represented herself while the respondent was represented by a company director. Oral reasons were given at the hearing.
Decision
Employment Judge Hutchings dismissed all three claims brought by Mrs Nortje, finding that none were well-founded. The tribunal rejected the claims for redundancy payment, unfair dismissal, and breach of contract for notice pay after considering the evidence and arguments presented over the two-day hearing.
Practical note
All three claims were dismissed on their merits after a full hearing, demonstrating that the employer successfully defended against allegations of unfair dismissal, failure to pay redundancy, and breach of contract regarding notice.
Case details
- Case number
- 6014833/2024
- Decision date
- 24 June 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 2
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- financial services
- Represented
- No
- Rep type
- self
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No