Cases6005500/2025

Claimant v Utopia Landscapes Limited

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claim was struck out because the claimant had less than two years of service and therefore did not meet the qualifying period required under s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996 to bring an unfair dismissal complaint. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out despite being given the opportunity.

Facts

The claimant S Thurlow was employed by Utopia Landscapes Limited for less than two years before being dismissed. The claimant brought a complaint of unfair dismissal along with other unspecified complaints. The tribunal held a strike-out hearing to determine whether the unfair dismissal claim could proceed.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim on the grounds that the claimant lacked the qualifying service of two years required under s.108 ERA 1996. The claimant was given an opportunity to provide reasons why the claim should not be struck out but failed to do so. The claimant's other complaints remain to be considered at a case management hearing.

Practical note

Ordinary unfair dismissal claims require two years' continuous service, and claims lacking this qualifying period will be struck out unless the claimant can show the dismissal falls into an automatically unfair category.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108

Case details

Case number
6005500/2025
Decision date
20 June 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
No

Employment details

Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No