Claimant v Peters Dean Care Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal heard evidence over two days and determined that the respondent had not made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The complaint was found to be not well-founded and was dismissed.
Facts
Ms Waterhouse brought a claim against Peters Dean Care Limited alleging unauthorised deductions from her wages. The case was heard remotely via CVP over two days in June 2025. Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed the claim, finding it not well-founded. The tribunal determined that the respondent had not made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages as alleged.
Practical note
An unlawful deductions from wages claim failed where the tribunal was not satisfied that the employer had made unauthorised deductions as alleged by the employee.
Case details
- Case number
- 1400505/2024
- Decision date
- 20 June 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 2
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep