Cases8000539/2025

Claimant v Highland Agricultural Labour Services Limited

19 June 2025Before Employment Judge N M HosieScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out for non-compliance with a Tribunal order and for failure to actively pursue the claim. The claimant was given until 18 June 2025 to provide written reasons or request a hearing but failed to do so.

Facts

Mr Haddow brought a claim against Highland Agricultural Labour Services Limited. On 11 June 2025, the Tribunal ordered the claimant to provide written reasons by 18 June 2025 or request a hearing to show why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to comply with this order and did not provide reasons or request a hearing.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on two grounds: non-compliance with the Tribunal's order under rule 38(1)(c) and failure to actively pursue the claim under rule 38(1)(d). The claimant was given a clear opportunity to respond but failed to do so.

Practical note

Claimants must comply with tribunal orders and actively pursue their claims, or risk having them struck out even before the merits are considered.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(c)Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
8000539/2025
Decision date
19 June 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
agriculture
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Claimant representation

Represented
No