Claimant v Reliance Maintenance Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and judgment was entered in default under rule 21.
The respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and judgment was entered in default under rule 21.
Facts
Mr Andrews brought claims against Reliance Maintenance Ltd for wrongful dismissal (breach of contract regarding notice) and unpaid holiday pay. The respondent failed to present a valid response within the prescribed time limit following the claim being issued on 22 September 2024.
Decision
Employment Judge Adkinson entered judgment in default under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The claimant was awarded £625 gross for breach of contract relating to notice pay and £1,100 gross for unpaid holiday entitlement, totaling £1,725.
Practical note
Respondents who fail to submit a timely response face default judgment under rule 21, with the tribunal determining claims on the papers without a hearing.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6012462/2024
- Decision date
- 18 June 2025
- Hearing type
- rule 21
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Sector
- construction
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No