Claimant v Clinics Operations Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The respondent failed to present a response. The tribunal issued a default judgment under Rule 22, finding the respondent unlawfully withheld wages of £2,235.03 as evidenced by the September 2024 payslip provided by the claimant.
The respondent failed to present a response. The tribunal issued a default judgment under Rule 22, finding the respondent failed to pay accrued holiday entitlement of £1,723.08, calculated at £307.69 per day for 5.6 days of accrued holidays.
Facts
Mrs Alexander brought claims for unlawful deduction of wages and unpaid holiday pay against Clinics Operations Limited. The respondent failed to present any response to the claim. The claimant provided a September 2024 payslip showing unpaid wages of £2,235.03 net, and evidence of 5.6 days of accrued but unpaid holiday calculated at £307.69 per day.
Decision
Employment Judge Hosie issued a default judgment under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, ordering the respondent to pay £2,235.03 in unlawful deductions and £1,723.08 in unpaid holiday pay, totaling £3,958.11, subject to appropriate tax and National Insurance deductions.
Practical note
Where a respondent fails to present any response, tribunals will issue default judgments on wage and holiday pay claims based on documentary evidence alone under Rule 22.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6021402/2024
- Decision date
- 17 June 2025
- Hearing type
- rule 21
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No