Claimant v London Borough of Haringey
Outcome
Individual claims
The claim of victimisation was dismissed by the tribunal following a full merits hearing lasting 7 days. Both parties were represented by counsel. The tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing for its decision to dismiss the claim.
Facts
Mrs Jeng-Kanu brought a claim of victimisation against her employer, London Borough of Haringey. The case was heard over 7 days in June 2025 before a full tribunal panel. Both parties were represented by counsel throughout the hearing. The judgment was delivered orally with reasons given at the hearing.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed the victimisation claim. Oral reasons were provided at the hearing. The tribunal applied Rule 37 strike out provisions, though the substantive determination followed a full merits hearing with evidence and submissions from both parties.
Practical note
A victimisation claim brought against a local authority was dismissed after a lengthy full merits hearing where both parties were legally represented by counsel.
Case details
- Case number
- 3312057/2022
- Decision date
- 17 June 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 7
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Name
- London Borough of Haringey
- Sector
- local government
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister