Cases2500797/2024

Claimant v Surgo Construction Limited (in Administration)

16 June 2025Before Employment Judge ArullendranNorth Easton papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out for non-pursuit. Claimant failed to comply with the Tribunal Order dated 29 November 2024 and did not make representations or request a hearing when given the opportunity on 10 March 2025.

Facts

The claimant brought a claim against Surgo Construction Ltd, which entered administration. The Tribunal issued an Order on 29 November 2024 which the claimant failed to comply with. On 10 March 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit. The claimant failed to respond or make sufficient representations.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim on the papers on the basis that the claimant had not complied with a previous Tribunal Order, had not actively pursued the claim, and had failed to make representations or request a hearing when given the opportunity to do so.

Practical note

Claimants must comply with Tribunal Orders and actively pursue their claims; failure to respond to an unless order or strike-out warning will result in the claim being dismissed without a hearing.

Case details

Case number
2500797/2024
Decision date
16 June 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
construction
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No