Claimant v NHS Fife
Outcome
Individual claims
The claim arose from an interview on 12 February 2021 and offer on 3 March 2021 but was not presented until October 2022, a delay of 15 months beyond the time limit. The tribunal found the claimant had access to union advice, online resources, and knowledge of the Equality Act 2010, and was not absent due to stress until May 2022. The tribunal concluded it would not be just and equitable to extend time, finding no cogent explanation for the delay and greater prejudice to the respondent than the claimant.
The claim for arrears of pay relating to ANNP banding shortfall dated back to 2012-2013. The claimant admitted she knew by 2013 she was being underpaid and was aware of the Employment Rights Act 1996 by 1997-1998. The tribunal concluded it was not 'not reasonably practicable' for the claim to have been presented in time, and that presenting the complaint 9 years after the event was not within a reasonable further period.
The respondent argued under s95(2) ERA 1996 that the claimant was dismissed by the employer when her fixed-term contract expired after notice given on 12 April 2022 (extended to 5 June 2022), which she then resigned from on 20 May 2022. The tribunal reserved this issue for determination at the full merits hearing due to complexity around the claimant's rolling fixed-term contracts and the need for oral evidence.
The parties agreed that the issue of holiday pay would be reserved for determination at the full merits hearing.
Facts
The claimant was a nurse employed by Fife Health Board on successive fixed-term contracts from October 2019. She brought claims of age discrimination arising from an interview in February 2021, arrears of pay relating to ANNP banding shortfall from 2012-2013, constructive dismissal after resigning in May 2022, and holiday pay. The respondent gave notice of termination on 12 April 2022 (extended to 5 June 2022) and the claimant resigned on 20 May 2022. The claimant presented her ET1 on 19 October 2022.
Decision
The tribunal struck out the age discrimination claim as time-barred, finding no cogent explanation for the 15-month delay as the claimant had access to union advice, online resources, and knowledge of the Equality Act, and greater prejudice would accrue to the respondent. The ANNP banding arrears claim was also struck out as it was reasonably practicable to have brought the claim within time and 9 years was not a reasonable further period. The unfair dismissal and holiday pay claims were reserved for the merits hearing.
Practical note
Tribunals will strictly enforce time limits in discrimination and wage claims where claimants had access to advice and resources, and substantial unexplained delays will not satisfy the 'just and equitable' or 'not reasonably practicable' tests.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 8000116/2022
- Decision date
- 13 June 2025
- Hearing type
- preliminary
- Hearing days
- 2
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Name
- NHS Fife
- Sector
- —
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor
Employment details
- Role
- nurse
- Service
- 3 years
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No