Cases2227933/2024

Claimant v London United Busways Limited t/a RATP DEV Transit London

10 June 2025Before Employment Judge Gordon WalkerLondon Centralremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Breach of Contractstruck out

Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider the claim as it did not arise or was not outstanding on termination of employment. The pay rise agreement was reached after the claimant's employment ended and the claim arose at a later date, outside the scope of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994 Article 3.

Facts

The claimant was a bus driver employed for 25 years who suffered a stroke in September 2023 and was dismissed on 6 December 2023 while in hospital. After his dismissal, in February 2024, the respondent and union agreed a backdated pay rise from April 2023 and paid existing staff accordingly. The claimant sought the backdated pay rise for the period he worked between April 2023 and December 2023 but was told he was not entitled to it as he was no longer employed when the agreement was reached. He brought a breach of contract claim seeking this payment.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the claim for lack of jurisdiction. The judge held that this was not an unauthorised deduction claim but a breach of contract claim. As the right to payment arose after the claimant's employment ended when the pay agreement was reached, it did not arise or was not outstanding on termination. The tribunal therefore had no contractual jurisdiction under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994.

Practical note

Employment tribunals have no jurisdiction over contractual claims that arise after employment terminates, even if they relate to work done during the employment period, as the claim must arise or be outstanding at the point of termination.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994 Article 3

Case details

Case number
2227933/2024
Decision date
10 June 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
transport
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Employment details

Role
Bus driver
Service
25 years

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep