Claimant v Elite Wine Refrigeration Ltd

The respondent failed to respond to the claim in time and was refused an extension. Pursuant to Rule 22, the tribunal entered judgment for the claimant on liability for constructive unfair dismissal. The claimant alleged that the respondent's conduct cumulatively breached the implied term of mutual trust and confidence, entitling her to resign and treat herself as dismissed under section 95(1)(c) ERA 1996.

The respondent failed to respond to the claim in time and was refused an extension. Pursuant to Rule 22, the tribunal entered judgment for the claimant on liability for direct disability discrimination. The claimant alleged direct discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 related to fabricated performance issues, inconsistent treatment compared to non-disabled colleagues, and escalation of hostility following a colleague's promotion.

The respondent failed to respond to the claim in time and was refused an extension. Pursuant to Rule 22, the tribunal entered judgment for the claimant on liability for discrimination arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010. The claimant alleged she was demoted in early 2025 related to her disability and experienced escalating hostility from April 2024 onwards.

The respondent failed to respond to the claim in time and was refused an extension. Pursuant to Rule 22, the tribunal entered judgment for the claimant on liability for failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010. The claimant alleged the respondent failed to accommodate her chronic health condition.