Cases6003939/2025

Claimant v Consol tanning

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claimant was employed for less than two years and therefore lacked the qualifying service required under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to bring an unfair dismissal claim. The claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's letters requesting representations, and the claim was struck out.

Facts

Shannon Miller-Gardner brought an unfair dismissal claim against Consol tanning. She was employed for less than two years. The tribunal wrote to her twice giving her the opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out due to lack of qualifying service, but she failed to respond to either letter.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant lacked the required two years' qualifying service under section 108 ERA 1996 and failed to respond to the tribunal's letters requesting representations as to why the claim should not be struck out.

Practical note

Claimants must have two years' continuous service to bring ordinary unfair dismissal claims, and failure to respond to tribunal correspondence requesting representations can result in a strike-out.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108

Case details

Case number
6003939/2025
Decision date
6 June 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
other
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No