Claimant v Compass Group UK and Ireland Ltd

The tribunal found that the claimant failed to identify a provision, criterion, or practice (PCP) with the requisite group-based impact required under section 19 of the Equality Act 2010. No such PCP was identified in the claimant's further particulars or oral submissions. The reconsideration application was refused as it merely restated arguments already considered without establishing any procedural mishap or unfairness.

The tribunal struck out the redundancy claim as speculative and unsupported by evidence. There was no redundancy situation, no closure of workplace, and no dismissal by reason of redundancy. The claimant resigned voluntarily. The reconsideration application was refused as it merely sought to reargue points already considered without demonstrating any procedural error.

The tribunal initially struck out this claim for lack of particulars. On reconsideration, the judge accepted that the claimant's inability to provide full particulars was materially caused by the respondent's failure to provide payslips and pension records. The tribunal found this amounted to a procedural mishap, as the wages claim is inherently document-based. The strike-out was set aside and the claim restored to allow for proper disclosure and particularisation.