Cases1402187/2024

Claimant v Care South

6 June 2025Before Employment Judge LiveseyBristolremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Redundancy Payfailed

The claimant sought additional redundancy payment beyond what had already been paid by the respondent. The tribunal dismissed the claim, finding the claimant was not entitled to further redundancy payment above what had been received.

Facts

Mrs Hills brought a claim against Care South seeking an additional redundancy payment beyond what had already been paid to her. The case was heard remotely via video. The claimant represented herself while the respondent was represented by a solicitor. Limited facts are available from the judgment as written reasons were not provided.

Decision

Employment Judge Livesey dismissed the claimant's claim for additional redundancy payment. The tribunal found that the claimant was not entitled to any redundancy payment above what had already been paid by the respondent.

Practical note

Employees who have received a redundancy payment must demonstrate clear entitlement to any additional sums claimed beyond what the employer has already paid.

Case details

Case number
1402187/2024
Decision date
6 June 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
No