Claimant v We Love Dogs Rossendale Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
Claim struck out for failure to actively pursue. The tribunal gave the claimant notice and opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out, but the claimant failed to respond or make sufficient representations.
Facts
Mrs Lacey brought a claim against We Love Dogs Rossendale Ltd. The tribunal sent a letter dated 12 May 2025 giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit. The claimant failed to respond or make sufficient representations.
Decision
Employment Judge Phil Allen struck out the claim on the papers for failure to actively pursue. The claimant was given notice and opportunity to respond but did not do so.
Practical note
Claimants must actively respond to tribunal directions or risk having their claims struck out for non-pursuit, even without a hearing.
Case details
- Case number
- 2407043/2024
- Decision date
- 6 June 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No