Cases4106564/2024

Claimant v Nacor Healthcare Services Ltd

5 June 2025Before Employment Judge L DohertyScotlandin person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Automatic Unfair Dismissalstruck out

Claim under s.152(1)(a) TULRCA (dismissal for trade union membership) struck out as presented outside the 3-month time limit. Tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time. Claimant had reasonable opportunity to find out about dismissal by late November/early December 2023 but waited until June 2024 to enquire. Trade union support was available throughout.

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

Claim under s.94 ERA struck out as presented outside the 3-month time limit from effective date of termination. Tribunal determined EDT was late November/early December 2023 (when claimant had reasonable opportunity to find out about dismissal), not June 2024 as claimant argued. Tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time.

Wrongful Dismissalstruck out

Wrongful dismissal claim struck out as presented outside the 3-month time limit from effective date of termination. Time limit contingent on date of dismissal, which tribunal found to be late November/early December 2023 at the latest.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesstruck out

Claims for unpaid wages, statutory sick pay, and failure to pay for shadow shifts struck out as presented outside the 3-month time limit. Claimant was paid monthly; even if one month in arrears, the last deduction would have been within one month of dismissal in late 2023. Claim presented in August 2024 was well outside the limitation period.

Holiday Paystruck out

Claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay on termination struck out as presented outside the 3-month time limit. Time runs from date of dismissal (late November/early December 2023), making the August 2024 claim well out of time.

Breach of Contractstruck out

Claims for breach of contract (failure to provide work, failure to pay wages and sick pay) struck out as presented outside the 3-month time limit from effective date of termination, which tribunal found to be late November/early December 2023.

Detrimentnot determined

Detriment claims under s.146 TULRCA and s.12(1) Employment Relations Act 1999 allowed to proceed. Tribunal found alleged detriments formed a series of acts, with at least one (harassing telephone call/text post-July 2024) falling within the limitation period. Tribunal determined it should not make final determination on time bar until all evidence heard at full merits hearing. Case listed for 4-day final hearing.

Facts

Claimant, a Nigerian migrant working as a home care worker on a Certificate of Sponsorship visa, was summarily dismissed when her COS was revoked on 29 October 2023, though she was not informed of this. The dismissal followed a failed meeting on 19 October 2023 where she was accompanied by a union representative. She discovered her COS had been revoked when contacted by the Home Office on 6 November 2023. She applied for NHS employment but the offer was withdrawn following an unfavourable reference from the respondent. She only formally enquired about her employment status with the respondent in June 2024 via her trade union, and presented her tribunal claim on 19 August 2024.

Decision

The tribunal struck out most claims (unfair dismissal, breach of contract, unlawful deduction of wages, holiday pay) as presented outside the 3-month time limit. The tribunal determined the effective date of termination was late November/early December 2023 when the claimant had a reasonable opportunity to find out about her dismissal, not June 2024 as she argued. It was reasonably practicable for her to present claims in time as she had trade union support throughout but made no enquiry until June 2024. The detriment claims were allowed to proceed to a full hearing as they formed a series of acts with at least one falling within the limitation period.

Practical note

Even where an employee is not formally notified of dismissal, time limits run from when they have a reasonable opportunity to find out about it, and failure to make reasonable enquiry despite having trade union support will prevent a finding that it was not reasonably practicable to present a claim in time.

Legal authorities cited

Brown v Southall & Knight 1980 ICR 617Machine Tool Industry Research Association v Simpson 1988 ICR 558Robinson v Bowskill 2014 ICR D7Gisda Cyf v Barratt 2010 ICR 1475

Statutes

TULRCA s.147TULRCA s.146ERA 1996 s.111ERA 1996 s.97ERA 1996 s.94TULRCA s.152Employment Relations Act 1999 s.12Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order Article 8B

Case details

Case number
4106564/2024
Decision date
5 June 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
4
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Employment details

Role
home care worker
Service
4 months

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor